It’s time to review several things we’ve covered in past BWE posts – Part II

By BOB CUNNINGHAM

Continuing with the post from last week, in which we are examining some basic financial principles from a “fantasy and reality” perspective:

“Invest in your company’s 401K Plan.”  The most common workplace retirement savings vehicle is a 401K Plan, which is a qualified (i.e. government-sponsored) account in which the company holds your money and pays a brokerage to invest it for you into various securities.

FANTASY:   Max out your 401K Plan (the government places limits on how much you are allowed to contribute annually) as soon as you can.  The government is truly generous in allowing us an account that can grow tax-deferred.

REALITY:   Doing so means you’re trusting others to manage your money, in markets that are risky and volatile, and forfeiting access to your money until you’re age 59 1/2 (unless you want to pay a 10% penalty on top of standard taxation) and the account has been in existence at least five years.  It’s true that many companies offer a match up to a certain percentage of your income.  As a secondary retirement savings instrument, I’m fine with maximizing the company match (example – company matches 25% of the first 5% you have deducted from your paycheck to be put into your 401K).  Otherwise, there are better places to put your savings where you have safety and complete control. And once and for all:  Tax-deferred doesn’t mean tax-free, and it doesn’t result in more compiled money once you’ve paid income tax at the back-end.

“The most important aspect of investing is Rate of Return.” How much compound interest your money makes as it is invested in stocks, bonds, precious metals, real estate, or any other from among a host of investment choices IS something you’re going to want to track.  But there are other factors.

FANTASY:  You should be investing your money where you can earn the highest returns.  The stock market has risk, but it has gone up steadily over the long-term so if you leave your money in the markets, you’ll most certainly come out ahead.

REALITY:  I can’t quite recall where I first read the following, but the adage is oh-so accurate:  The most important part of savings and investing isn’t the return on your money.  It’s the return of your money.  I’ve never fully understood why otherwise sensible people have allowed themselves to become convinced that they should put their hard-earned life savings at significant risk.  In 2008-09, I personally knew folks who saw their nest-eggs drop by 40 percent.  They are just now fully recouping those losses, and that’s amidst the longest-lasting bull market in any of our lifetimes.  Remember, in a previous post we demonstrated how a 5% return every year can out-perform and average of 10 percent over the same period, in the same way that a 50% gain followed by a 50% loss results in a 25% net loss (Don’t believe me? Try it starting with $100 to make the math simple).  Slow and steady wins the race.  Just ask either the tortoise or the hare.  Better yet, ask them both.  Wouldn’t steady gains with no market risk – that’s zero risk, ladies and gentlemen – seem to be more intelligent when it comes to something as important as retirement savings? As opposed to hoping your funds return double-digits and avoid big declines along the way?  The answer is yes, because it is,

“Buy term and invest the difference.” This expression, of course, is referring to life insurance.  There two primary types – term and permanent.  Term insurance is solely a death benefit in exchange for a monthly (or annual) premium.  Permanent insurance includes products like whole life insurance, and can be set up to function in several capacities in addition to providing a death benefit.

FANTASY:  Because term is cheaper, it is advisable to buy term and then take the amount of money you’re saving on premiums versus permanent insurance and invest it in the stock market or other vehicle for long-term returns.

REALITY:  It sounds logical enough on its face, but two big problems here.  First, the vast majority of folks who intend to follow this strategy won’t “invest” the difference.  They will spend it… on stuff that depreciates.  And I simply don’t believe in unrealistic advice, even if the logic is sound (which it really isn’t here).  Secondly, there’s an obvious reason that permanent insurance tends to be more expensive than term.  IT DOES A LOT MORE FOR YOU!  Dividend-paying whole life, the product choice for permanent insurance suggested by this blog, offers a host of “living benefits” in addition to the fundamental death benefit.  The premiums are higher because the product is superior, on numerous levels. To recommend term strictly because it’s cheaper demonstrates a lack of reasonable research and comparison.

I hope you enjoyed this review and reaped some additional wisdom, or at least some reinforcement, from it.  Once again, thank you for taking time from your busy schedule to join us weekly on this site.

***

DISCLAIMER:  This post represents the author’s opinions only.  In no way should any part of the content of this post be interpreted as official financial advice, nor does it represent an intention to solicit readers into a specific company or investment.  Results are never guaranteed.  Utilize the information as you see fit, make all money decisions at your own risk.

 

It’s time to review several things we’ve covered in past BWE posts – Part I

By BOB CUNNINGHAM

(Note to my readers:  My apologies for being a day late with this post.  This marks a permanent change to Tuesday morning release of my new post each week.  The change is due primarily to professional convenience.  Thanks for your understanding.)

This website is, first and foremost, dedicated to coaching people how to best go about the various tasks related to savvy personal finance.  Achieving success can be accomplished through a mixture of some sound fundamental principles, combined with the reality that many strategies which are considered advisable by the masses are, instead, more beneficial to others.

What does that all mean?  Translated into one expression,

    “Unconventional wisdom, in many cases, is better than conventional.”

As you read, listen, watch, and research the world of personal finance, you will encounter some common themes preached by everyone from the most famous gurus to the tiniest out-of-the-mainstream blogs (I’d like to believe I’m somewhere in between, but closer to the latter than the former.)

This blog has been dedicated to assisting you in deciphering what to believe and trust, and what not to.  We’ve taken individual topics and broken them down into pieces small enough to digest in a way that allows us to effectively learn just how such habits can affect us, short- and long-term.

What I haven’t really done, until the paragraphs to follow today and next week, is put together a summary of the major points made through this blog’s seven months of existence.  So let’s get to it.  I’m calling this, “Personal Finance:  Fantasy and Reality.”  Part I is below, with Part II to run Oct 17.

“Pay Yourself First.”   This is arguably the most common adage in the world of money.  It simply means that you should set aside money for savings and/or investing before you earmark funds to pay your bills and for everyday expenses.  The theory, of course, is that if you get in the habit of doing this, you’re guaranteed to save more and anything is better than nothing.

FANTASY:  Saving even the smallest amount on a regular basis will eventually lead to significant holdings, from which you can build on additionally.

REALITY:  While it’s true that something is always better than nothing, there has to be a definitive goal for increasing savings regularly, and it should only be undertaken after expensive personal debt, such as credit cards that can have APRs well more than 20 percent, is eradicated.  One of the most common mistakes is to save slowly in an account earning less than 1% while simultaneously carrying a balance on a credit card charging 23.9% interest compounded.  Spend every extra dime paying off the card, stop charging stuff unless you pay it off entirely by the due date, and THEN ratchet up the savings to blow away what you would have accumulated – and wasted – otherwise.

“You need to save at least 3 to 6 months of living expenses in an emergency account.”  The idea is that if you have this kind of a reserve, loss of your job for an extended period won’t put you in the poorhouse – or worse, your parents’ basement.

FANTASY:  This is one of my favorite finance fables.  Some pretty well-known gurus claim it’s better to have a year’s worth saved.  Sure, and it would be better if my retirement savings had one or two additional zeroes, too.  In truth, for 95% of the population on this planet it is a complete fantasy to have a liquid cash reserve of $10,000 or more and be willing to leave it alone for a rainy day.  There’s a better HD television available.  It’s an emergency!!

REALITY:  A much savvier plan is a basic reserve fund of $1,000-$2,000 for things such as auto repairs.  But actually, I propose to use your credit cards as your emergency fund.  As long as you’re disciplined – and let’s face it, discipline is required when utilizing any type of advisable strategy – you can use a credit card to charge a true emergency and then formulate a plan to pay off the card with minimal damage.  Saving more than the aforementioned $1K-$2K means you’re not utilizing legitimate funds properly.  You should be investing those funds in debt elimination, or a dividend-paying whole life insurance policy, or if you must, low-cost index funds, or even in your work’s 401K plan (more on that next week).  All are preferable to letting inflation eat away at the buying power of a tidy sum dedicated to nothing… and earning next to nothing in a regular savings account.

“Avoid credit cards.”  Because they are debt instruments, many gurus advise to ignore them entirely, except perhaps for one card that can be used only in a “true emergency.”

FANTASY:  Just pay cash for everything, and you won’t need cards.  Credit cards only benefit the companies who issue them.  They victimize their customers unfairly.

REALITY:  Credit cards are great, but ONLY when used wisely and properly.  Running up a balance on an account charging such high interest rates is fiscal mutilation.  But if you are able to obtain 3-4 cards, each with cash-back allowances (preferably in rotating categories offering as high as 5%), and you use them for everyday regular expenses while ALWAYS paying off the entire balance prior to the next minimum payment being due, you not only avoid unnecessary costs, but also accrue small refunds, and at the same time build a favorable credit history.  Plus, your purchase of tangible goods are often insured by the card company, a service not provided by cash or a debit card.

“When strategically paying off credit card debt, pay off the smallest balance first.” As opposed to eliminating the account with the highest APR, many financial advisers propose the “snowball” strategy versus the “avalanche” approach.

As the AFLAC duck often exclaims, “Huh??”

FANTASY:  Paying off your smallest balances first, before working on the larger ones, yields quicker results and gives you a sense of accomplishment. This increases your chances of sticking with the program.

REALITY:  I won’t argue with psychology because I’m not educated in that area beyond my Psych I college course explaining the difference between Sigmund Freud’s id, ego, and superego.  But our goal is to save money on interest, so why would I pay off an account charging 16% before one jacking me for 24%?  The latter is going to require a larger minimum payment, so I want that one outta-here ASAP.  Look, if you have two accounts of very similar rates (like, within 1% of each other) and you choose the smaller one in order to get rid of it quicker, knock yourself out.  But don’t leap over dollars for psychological nickels.  Just dedicate yourself to the task with the knowledge that it is what is best for your long-term financial health, and save every dollar you can.

That’s it for Part I.  See ya next week for the conclusion of our review.

As always, thank you for reading.

***

DISCLAIMER:  This post represents the author’s opinions only.  In no way should any part of the content of this post be interpreted as official financial advice, nor does it represent an intention to solicit readers into a specific company or investment.  Results are never guaranteed.  Utilize the information as you see fit, make all money decisions at your own risk.

Tax reform important, including to those who don’t think they have much to tax

By BOB CUNNINGHAM

Frequently, when the subject of taxes comes up I hear people refer to their own lack of income and assets, and indicate that “any changes won’t affect me much..”

Even if the statement were true, which it almost always isn’t, that represents the wrong attitude when considering your personal finance.

Sure, many people – primarily younger adults still trying to get themselves established – lack the income and/or asset accumulation to be significantly affected by marginal tax rates and such.  But it’s still a good idea to understand how the system works, and how new changes in the law compare, because eventually, such things will directly impact your bottom line.

I’m not going to attempt to go into any sort of detail in this space on the proposals recently offered by President Trump.  It would take a great deal more space than is practical to dedicate here in order to do it justice.

Nor do I intend to go all political on you.  Again, that’s not what this blog is for.

But I will comment on some specifics, and suggest you pay attention to them regardless of your current economic standing.  NOTE:  Nothing from this post, or anything else found on this website, should be interpreted as professional advice.  For all things tax-related, seek the advice of a certified tax professional.

The major tone to the president’s changes elicits simplicity – purportedly, 80 percent of Americans will be able to file their taxes annually on one sheet of paper.  Wow… I presume we will need both sides of the page?

The simplification in terms of tax rates is two-fold.  First, the proposal suggests a low-end tax rate of 12 percent, up 2 percent, among only three levels.  What… he’s raising taxes on the lowest income Americans?

Hardly.  Instead, as I understand it, those who don’t make enough currently to be required to pay federal tax will still be under that line.  And the aforementioned 2 percent difference will more than be made up for by a doubling of the standard deductions, for both individuals and married couples.

And some long-held itemized deductions, like for mortgage interest and charitable contributions, will remain intact.  Other deductions, however, such as home office write-offs and gambling losses (currently, the law allows you to claim losses up to a maximum equal to any claimed winnings) would go by the wayside.

After the 12 percent, the other two rates are 25 percent and 35 percent, plus possibly an additional upper bracket still to be determined.  Currently, the top bracket is about 39%.

Also unclear is the treatment of capital gains.  Under current law, they are taxed at a cap of 15 percent – this affects you and me if you understand that, in order to get the capital gains rate on the growth of your investments, you are required to have held these investments at least for one year.  If you sell stock less than 12 months after you bought it, folks, any gains are taxed as regular income. That can make a substantial difference.

It’s also important to understand that the 12%, 25%, 35% and whatever other rates are included in the new proposal are, like the current system, tiered.  In other words, if your adjusted gross income is $100,000 per year, you would fall under the 25% rate.  But that doesn’t mean all $100K is taxed at 25%.  Instead only, the portion that falls within the 25% rate range is taxed at that rate.

So in a fictional example, you may get taxed nothing on the first $25,000, 12% for dollars $25,001 through $74,999, and 25% for dollars $75,000 through $100,000. Again, these numbers are fictional for ease of explanation, but if the above were true, your effective tax rate on $100,000 would be $5,999.88 (12% of 74,999 – $25,000) + $6,250 (25% of $100,000 – $75,000) = $12,249.88, or about 12.25%.

In the meantime, as Washington D.C. labors over tax reform and other issues, your job as an individual (or couple, if you’re married), is to pay as little in taxes as you can legally avoid.

Doing so starts with understanding the basics of how your taxes are determined… and may be perpetuated by utilizing tax-friendly strategies including (but not limited to), Roth Individual Retirement Accounts, maximum leverage on personal as well as investment real estate, and owning dividend-paying whole life insurance policies as a central part of your financial plan.

We’ve discussed the life insurance aspect in previous posts, and we will continue to explore these types of strategies in the future.  So stay with me, and as always…

Thanks for reading.

***

DISCLAIMER:  This post represents the author’s opinions only.  In no way should any part of the content of this post be interpreted as official financial advice, nor does it represent an intention to solicit readers into a specific company or investment.  Results are never guaranteed.  Utilize the information as you see fit, make all money decisions at your own risk.

What you should know about car loans, when obtaining one is your only option

By BOB CUNNINGHAM

Most personal finance gurus agree that the one type of debt that is acceptable to have is a home mortgage.  As soon as you can reasonably afford such a hefty monthly output, and provided you have some money for a down payment and closing costs, it’s generally better to buy a residence than to rent.

I agree completely with the second part of the above statement, but not the first sentence.  Well… not exactly as it is written.

I have learned that a home loan is, indeed, okay as long as you’ve avoided going in over your head.  I also believe that under the right circumstances, obtaining auto financing is just fine in the big savvy-money-management scheme of things.

To be clear, not everyone who desires new wheels should be out applying for a car loan. If you’re already in a lot of debt (i.e. credit card debt), and/or don’t have steady employment or another reliable source of income, locking up $300 or so per month for the next five or six years is foolish.  You likely wouldn’t qualify anyway.

However, the old-school thinking that you should pay cash for everything except your house, under all circumstances, is unrealistic and sometimes downright ill-advised.  Under certain reasonable but necessary parameters, you should feel fine about going into some debt for your car.  Why?  Because the risks of buying only what you can afford by paying cash often outweighs the temporary negative associated with using credit, even on a depreciating asset.

In a perfect world, you WOULD avoid traditional financing.  A dividend-paying whole life insurance policy, such as what this website has been detailing periodically since its inception, with sufficient funds in its cash value is a far superior method for buying a car because it is “self-financing,” and allows the policy owner to continue growing his/her money even while tying up funds in the new ride.  Set up properly, you wouldn’t lose the growth that money would earn had you not went car shopping.

It’s a really cool and wise way to go about it, but this particular post isn’t dedicated to that, because I realize many of my readers are younger and either don’t yet have the insurance policy or don’t have enough saved in cash value to collateralize a loan sufficient to buy the desired automobile.

So that means your choices are, 1) walk/ride the bus/ride a bike, 2) buy something so cheap for cash that it could break down at any moment, as mentioned above, or 3) qualify for a loan in order to buy a car that will likely last for several years.

It’s fairly obvious, I would think, that a huge majority in such circumstances will opt for Choice #3.  So here are some tips for making a smart purchase, and getting yourself financially to a point that this doesn’t hurt your ultimate bottom line much, if at all:

1. Buy pre-owned, not brand new.  The beauty of buying a car that is two or three years old is that you can save a higher percentage off the new model’s sticker price than has been spent in terms of the pre-owned car’s expected lifespan. Yes of course, I will explain.

For example, say you’re after a Toyota Corolla.  Not sexy, true, but usually super reliable. A brand new one typically goes for about $23,000, as per my research, but an average of the half-dozen or so appropriate pre-owned Corollas I found was about $14,000. The latter refers to a 2015 model or newer, less than 40,000 miles, and an average of no more than 15,000 miles per 12 months of the car’s life since it was originally bought new (I recommend 12,000 miles).  Most auto-buying websites list not only the year of the car, but info such as when the car was originally bought, month and year.  If you don’t have that information, a CarFax report – free for the asking from dealers – will show it.

OK, so $14,000 is about 61% of the car’s new price today (another way of stating this is the pre-owned car is discounted 39% from new), but 40K miles is only about 20% of the very reasonable expected lifespan (if maintained properly) of 200,000 miles.  That difference (19% in this example) is value for you.  Let the person who originally bought the car absorb that excessive depreciation.  KBB.com indicates a new car loses an estimated 20%-25% of its value as soon the buyers leaves the lot with it.

2. Get pre-qualified for a loan BEFORE you go see and drive cars. You have a lot more leverage knowing what you can pay ahead of time. But don’t qualify for the maximum your credit and other circumstances allow.  Be content to buy a little under your means, so that you have a comfort level with the payment and also have the option to pad the minimum required payments if you wish in order to reduce the principal balance faster and pay off the loan sooner.

Speaking of paying it off, do not apply or sign for a loan of more than five years (60 months).  It’s silly to pay for six or seven years on a car that, in great likelihood, you won’t have or want to retain before the end of the term. Plus, of course, you will pay more interest over the longer the term if you make just the minimum payments.  (Take note, however, that if the interest rate is identical on a six-year term vs. five years, which it frequently is, and you KNOW you have the discipline and willingness to pay at least 10% extra every month, it makes sense to go ahead and get the 72 months.  But ONLY if the above is accurate for you and your circumstances)

With the above said, it is generally best to go with the shortest loan term you can afford considering the aforementioned “padding” and comfort level for the required minimum payment.

3. Know the Kelley Blue Book (or comparable) values of your target car before you head to the lot.  It is important that you make your buying decision based on the total price of the car, and NOT based on the monthly payment.  Auto sales reps make a good living showing prospective customers how they can actually afford the car of their dreams (translation:  a car they really have no business buying) with the loan stretched out far enough.

With that in mind, know what your target car is worth and should sell for, allowing for a modest profit for the dealership – a good rule of thumb is no more than 10% above private party value.  Don’t be concerned with dealer retail or average price of similar cars sold in the area.  You can do better if you’re willing to work at it a little (see No. 4).

Lastly, it’s obvious that you must test drive your car of choice.  But when you do, really put it through its paces.  Ask the salesperson to direct you to a quiet side street and try an abrupt stop to test brakes, complete a sharp u-turn to test radius, and do a three-point turn to assure the transmission’s smooth functionality going from drive to reverse and vice-versa.  Ask for a certificate from the dealership guaranteeing all buttons, switches, lights, etc. are in good working order.  If that isn’t available, personally inspect and test everything.

4.  No-haggle pricing is NOT to your benefit.  Have your info, and stick to your guns while being reasonable.  Many car dealers are advertising no-haggle pricing in an attempt to cater to those who find the car-buying process stressful or even distasteful.  This is nonsense.  Haggling is to your benefit.  Arrive at what you’re willing to pay for the car based on the above parameters… and don’t buckle when the salesperson tells you their price is, “the best we’re going to be able to do I’m afraid.”  I can practically guarantee you that if you’re reasonable in what you’re willing to pay, and you’re willing to leave the lot if you don’t get close to what you’re requesting, the deal will get done to your satisfaction. The dealership wants and needs your business a lot more than the few hundred extra dollars they appear to be unwilling to discount for you.

5.  Make your car payments automatic through your bank’s online bill-pay. Set it to make the payment each month 3-5 days before it is due, and forget it.  And preferably, add at least $25 or 10% – whichever is greater – to the minimum payment when you set up the automatic payments.  You’re unlikely to feel the extra out-go in your monthly budget, and yet you could knock six months, a year, or more off the loan term.

There’s a lot to consider when buying a car, especially if you’re willing (and qualified) to make a long-term commitment by borrowing funds. Use the above as a basic guide, and you will undoubtedly come away pleased, while having not fallen into the trap of over-paying.

Once again, thanks for reading.

***

DISCLAIMER:  This post represents the author’s opinions only.  In no way should any part of the content of this post be interpreted as official financial advice, nor does it represent an intention to solicit readers into a specific company or investment.  Results are never guaranteed.  Utilize the information as you see fit, make all money decisions at your own risk.

‘Budgeting’ has negative connotations for some, but it doesn’t have to be that way

By BOB CUNNINGHAM

In personal finance parlance, it is known as “the B word.” And not in any sort of positive way.

Budgeting, defined as the excruciating act of creating a personal or family summary of income and expenses for the purposes of determining what can be spent and (hopefully) saved, carries such a negative vibe that some alleged PF gurus claim you can effectively manage your money without it.

Not likely…

Look, it’s really a matter of what you want to accomplish, in life and specifically when it comes to your money.  Are you truly satisfied to wing it from week to week, month to month and hope you have enough to get by?  Or are you willing to put in a little effort, in the boring form of crunching numbers, to improve your circumstances?

If you are among the vast majority of folks who want to make financial progress ongoing, there’s no way around some version of monetary accountability.

Still, that doesn’t mean it has to be painful… or a pain in the posterior. Budgeting is actually relatively simple, if you decide to keep it that way. Here’s how:

Know as accurately as possible your monthly take-home pay

True, determining what you make isn’t always that simple.  Sales professionals who work on commission, for instance, can have a wide variation in what they make from month to month. But there are ways around this.  First, determine an average income.  Go back three months, six months, or whatever time-frame you believe can most accurately reflect your net pay, and come up with a “common” figure.

Obviously, if you are on salary, you simply need to take a peek at your paycheck, or observe the associated direct deposit in your bank account.

Now reduce that number by 20% for budgeting purposes.  For instance, if you’ve determined that your average monthly net income is about $3,000, reduce it by 20% ($600) and work with $2,400 as you figure your budget. The 20-percent fudge factor allows for errors and anomalies while also demonstrating to you (eventually) that you can get by with less than you think. What if you only make $1,500 in a particular month… are you going to have to move back in with your parents?  You may be nodding your head after reading this, but we both know you’ll do whatever it takes to avoid that scenario.

Make savings an integral part of any “spending” plan

Next take at least 5% of the $2,400 (10% is reommended), and mark it down as your monthly savings goal.  Yep, do it now… this resulting $120 for socking away in our example is important – commit to it, even before you figure out what your bills are.  That comes next.

Once you have your typical monthly income established, and your associated monthly commitment for savings, the next step is to mark down your fixed expenses.  These are the monthly bills that are the same every month – rent or mortgage payment, car payment, TV/internet bills, cellphone bill (in most cases), loan payment to Mom and Dad, etc.  It doesn’t matter what they’re for, if you pay them and they are constant, they should be included here.

Determine your expenses in two broad categories first

Now add up the total of your fixed expenses, tack on the aforementioned $120 savings figure, and come up with a total.  Then, take that total and subtract it from the $2,400.  The result is what you have available to spend monthly on what is referred to as discretionary spending – the costs that change every month, such as groceries, gasoline, and entertainment.

Guess what? You’re more than half finished.  Not exactly bamboo under the fingernails, correct?

OK, sure, I’m not claiming this is as fun as Space Mountain on Halloween. But it’s a lot less costly.

Be willing to go back through previous spending history

Now comes a little bit of effort, because you need to go back through your on-line banking or credit card receipts, and determine how much you’ve been spending on those discretionary costs.  My suggestion is that you separate them into the following categories:  groceries, eating out, gasoline, entertainment, and miscellaneous.

After you have those figures determined for the last month (ideally, figure out three months’ worth of each category and average for a more accurate monthly reference), take the monthly figures and add them up.  Compare to what your new budget “allows” you to spend.  Analyze what you’ve been overspending on, and what you’ve been more reasonable about. Adjust accordingly. Let logic and common sense be your guide.

For instance, let’s say your discretionary spending amount that you determined from your income/fixed expenses/savings portion of the budget is $600 per month. And you’ve determined you’ve been spending closer to $900 per month.  That means we need to find $300 to cut, but remember that we took your initial average take-home pay and cut it by 20 percent.  That was $600 lopped off the $3,000 average monthly pay, yes?

Decide on spending cuts if needed, but you don’t have to go overboard

So whatever we determine needs to be cut, it probably doesn’t truly need to be as drastic because we padded the initial income figure by using only 80 percent of it.  Are you with me?

In other words, you have some leeway… as long as you’re prepared to make some needed cuts when it’s obvious.  Are you going out to the movies a lot, or do you mostly stay in and watch Netflix? How ’bout fast-food?  That is the young adults’ most significant bug-a-boo, bar none.  Are you on a first-name basis with the folks at Carl’s Jr.?  If so, that has to change.  Cooking at home typically costs a fifth of fast-food, and a tenth or less compared to eating at sit-down restaurants.  How about at the grocery store?  Do you buy a lot of processed and/or name-brand foods, or do you focus on produce, dairy, and generic stuff?

After you have determined all your adjustments, be sure that the first thing you do at the beginning of each month is put the savings away. “Pay Yourself First” is a universally accepted personal finance adage for assuring you save regularly regardless of your budget.

Ultimately, as long as you’re willing to do a little self-analysis with what you spend, and make some common-sense alterations, it can be pretty simple and only a little painful.

If nothing else, make a commitment to avoid high-interest debt

Last item:  I could easily write 10,000 words about sensible budget decisions, cutting spending, etc.  But that isn’t the point of this post.  Instead, focus on the idea that getting basic organization in your financial life doesn’t have to be difficult and it truly doesn’t have to suck.

A huge take-away is this:  Whatever path you go, do your utmost to stay out of debt… specifically, credit cards that – speaking of sucking – will suck the life out of any possibility of you getting ahead with your money and ultimately being able to reasonably afford many of the things and experiences you desire.

As always, thank you for reading.

***

DISCLAIMER:  This post represents the author’s opinions only.  In no way should any part of the content of this post be interpreted as official financial advice, nor does it represent an intention to solicit readers into a specific company or investment.  Results are never guaranteed.  Utilize the information as you see fit, make all money decisions at your own risk.

Worried about a market correction? I’m not, because it won’t determine my fate

By BOB CUNNINGHAM

As I write this weekly entry, the Dow Jones is coming off a gain of more than 200 points.  Despite predictions of impending doom by some, and the realistic acknowledgement from even the most optimistic of investors that the markets won’t go up forever, they continue their improbable ascent.

It’s a lot like late 2006 and most of 2007, when we hit record highs according to all the major benchmarks… right before falling to Earth like a rocket in 2008, reducing many account balances by almost half in a matter of months, even weeks.

So why am I not concerned about the inevitable decline?  What puts me in a position of being so confident?  Simple… I’m flat broke and, thus, have nothing to lose.

LOL… JUST KIDDING.  How I crack myself up.  Truth is, while my wife and I are far from being considered wealthy, we have some decent retirement savings… we’re doing OK.

And the really cool thing is that our funds aren’t invested in the markets.

“But Bob, you’re missing out on some of the greatest profits ever!”

That’s true.  And we’re perfectly fine with that.  Our nest-egg is invested in dividend-paying whole life insurance, which gives us a steady and predictable gain… with NO chance of loss.

None. Nada. Zilch.

Look, friends, unless you’re brand new as a reader on this site, you’ve read here before about how losses annihilate an account more significantly than the same rate of gain helps.  I’ve demonstrated how average annual rate of return is a fallacy.  Go up 25% one year, go down 25% the next… and instead of being even, you’re actually down 12.5%.  Reverse the order – down the first year, then up the second – and you’re STILL down 12.5% after the second year.

Doesn’t seem fair, does it?

And while it is absolutely true that we are missing out on some pretty sweet gains right now, it is without question that we will be better off over the long run than those who insist on riding the roller coaster.  History says so… and I’m not willing to buck a trend lasting more than 140 years.

“Okay, but hasn’t the S&P 500 averaged about a 10% return all-time?  That’s what I always read.”

Again, that’s a bogus average – taking all the returns and adding them up (since after The Great Depression, I believe), subtracting the losses, and dividing by the total number of years.  The effective return, according to Morningstar.com, was slightly better than 3%.  The effective return is how much your money would have actually grown.  Dividend-paying whole life insurance returns between 4% and 5.5% (depending on dividends) EVERY YEAR, and is tax-free when the money is correctly acquired via withdrawals of principal and dividends and/or non-qualifying policy loans.

It’s truly great having a fairly specific idea of how much money you will have at any given time in the future.

“If this is true, why doesn’t everyone use dividend-paying whole life insurance, and get the heck out of the stock market altogether?”

Many would if they knew about it.  And more and more people are going that route, thanks to the strategy getting more publicity from sources such as this blog.  Still, the same conventional drivel of favoring 401Ks, IRAs, etc. continues to be perpetuated by Wall Street, many personal finance gurus, and our federal government.  It’s a constant battle.

The purpose of this blog is to educate folks… primarily, younger adults and families… that there is a much better way than conventional retirement savings vehicles.  The key is starting NOW.  This superior approach offers more safety, liquidity, a steady rate of return, tax benefits, and a living benefit that allows for self-financing of major purchases and other handy uses that you simply can’t get from traditional savings and investments.

And I’ll continue to plug these in this space and others.  Slowly, the tide will turn in favor of Americans who, like myself, want to retain complete control of their finances at all times.

As always, thank you for reading.

***

DISCLAIMER:  This post represents the author’s opinions only.  In no way should any part of the content of this post be interpreted as official financial advice, nor does it represent an intention to solicit readers into a specific company or investment.  Results are never guaranteed.  Utilize the information as you see fit, make all money decisions at your own risk.

Earning more income these days? That’s great, but be willing to spend less anyway!

By BOB CUNNINGHAM

One of the more common mistakes that folks make regarding personal finance, especially you younger adults, is to believe that getting a raise at work should equate to raising your standard of living.

The smart money managers don’t think that way.

The common mindset for those who simply haven’t yet fully embraced the idea of getting ahead financially, rather than merely keeping up, is to dedicate those extra dollars into new and improved personal benefits… a more spacious crib (I’m so street), a nicer ride, new clothes, or whatever… rather than the simple step of increasing the amount you save every month.

Worse, many still aren’t saving yet and are spending all (or more) of their income, whether it increases or not.

Now please, don’t get me wrong.  If you earn a substantial raise at work (or even a modest one), there’s nothing wrong with a little celebration – going out to a nice dinner, or maybe a splurge on a new outfit not available at Ross Dress For Less.  You probably worked hard to earn that pay increase, and you should feel fine about enjoying the fruits of your labor… to a point.

If, however, you’re the type who figures out that your monthly take-home just went up by $75, and you’re trying to determine which additional expense you can afford, that you couldn’t before, you’ll never really get ahead monetarily.

If you’ve been paying attention to this blog for any length of time, you will know that I am not a proponent of the live-below-your-means philosophy, but I only feel that way in that I believe saving should not be considered part of the means formula.

To clarify, I’m saying that savings should come off the very top (remember, always “pay yourself first,”), before your means is determined.  If you do that, then it’s fine to live right up to your means, provided you don’t go over it by running up debt or doing something else ill-advised.

Of course, a common response to this is “that sounds all well and good, Bob, but I don’t have any money to spare. I’m barely getting by.”  It’s the most common refrain by a wide margin – people simply refuse to believe there’s anything in their current routine that they can go without, but when I press them about how often they eat out (including fast food), shop for goodies on-line, have coffee at the local coffeehouse, or go to the movies, their answers inevitably range from “occasionally,” to “well, a person has to live.”

Sure they do.  But when you eat fast food, can you focus on the joint’s budget menu rather than get the $8 No. 1 combo?  Couldn’t you simply spend less time thinking of crap you want to buy at Amazon or Overstock.com? Can you settle on a Tall rather than a Venti?  Might you go see a flick during the daytime and pay matinee prices?

And then they get a raise, and they start eating out more, frequenting Starbucks twice as often, add E-Bay to their binge shopping, and see movies they liked a second time, under the premise that “I can afford it.  I just got a raise.”

How about, instead, increasing your savings… and potentially knocking several years off your working life that can be added to your retired life?  I don’t know about you, but why in the heck would anyone work until they’re 65, when the ability to retire 10-15 years sooner (or even earlier) is available?  They like their work?  Great… they should put themselves in a position to dictate EXACTLY how much they do, how often, for whom, etc. by making income a non-factor.

To summarize, you don’t have to go without basic needs and a few wants in order to be smart with your money.  But if you’re not saving something every month without questioning it – preferably, at least 10 percent of your take-home pay – and committing it before you pay any of your expenses, you’re missing the financial boat.

If your tendency is toward spending instead of saving, you have a decision to make.  Have a little more fun now.  Or, with the amazing power of compound interest, have a lot more fun later… both in quality and increased number of years you can worry about playing instead of working.

Then, your next raise won’t matter.  Thanks for reading.

***

DISCLAIMER:  This post represents the author’s opinions only.  In no way should any part of the content of this post be interpreted as official financial advice, nor does it represent an intention to solicit readers into a specific company or investment.  Results are never guaranteed.  Utilize the information as you see fit, make all money decisions at your own risk.

Seven steps for successfully beating the credit card companies at their own game

By BOB CUNNINGHAM

There are many folks out there who believe the credit card companies (more specifically, banks and other institutions which offer credit cards) are evil entities, with no other earthly purpose than to suck as much money from unsuspecting card holders as is inhumanly possible.

Yeah, that’s pretty much it. Who else would have you pay more than $17,000 for a $5,000 loan by essentially tricking you into paying a smaller monthly (minimum) payment when you could easily afford more in order to pay less interest?

But I’m not really down on these financial firms.  The folks at Bank of America, Capital One, Chase, and Wells Fargo… at Visa, Mastercard, and Discover are like virtually all businesses out there.  They want to make a profit in order to grow their business to, in turn, make more profit.  It’s an American mindset that has worked well for a lot of folks, and allowed a lot of other folks to obtain gainful employment.

Still, trying to learn the subtleties of how credit cards work – what you can be charged for, how much interest you pay if you run a balance, and how best to take advantage of the myriad of offers for new accounts – is a daunting task, especially for younger adults and families trying to navigate their way out of too much month at the end of the money.

So with that in mind, here are seven steps for the personal finance newbie to consider that will allow for befriending the credit card companies and coming out ahead of them in their own arena.

1) Start off by obtaining one new card with a small line of credit in order to begin establishing a credit history.  Even if you’re fresh out of high school and have never had your own credit card of any kind, it’s fairly easy to obtain one if you have a job. And if you do encounter difficulties getting a traditional card, contact a company like Premier Bank that will allow you to pay into a card account in advance, then charge off your established balance.

2) With your new card, go ahead and make one or more SMALL purchases, adding up to no more than $200, and start paying it off with monthly payments.  The purchase doesn’t have to be something separate, and certainly doesn’t need to be anything you wouldn’t otherwise buy.  Use your card for gas and groceries a few times, for instance.  When you have roughly $200 charged, plan to make four monthly payments of about $50.

By doing this, you are establishing a credit history.  In four months, the account will be paid off (do NOT charge anything else during the period you’re making the monthly payments).  And you will start receiving offers for more credit, from other companies with higher credit limits, including perhaps an offer or two of 0% APR promotional rates.

The cost for this exercise in credit-building?  About $14, based on the average newbie interest rate of 21% (according to BankRate.com).  So if you pay off your $200 in four months – or, one third of a year – the full-year interest you would pay would be $42, divided by three = $14.  Fourteen bucks is a small price to pay when you consider all the benefits you will ultimately reap from a quickly-established positive credit history.

I should point out that stretching the $200 purchase into four payments is a much better and more effective way to establish credit than paying off the whole $200 during the first month.  Why is this?  Because the credit card companies want you to carry a balance.  They make a lot more money if you have a monthly balance owed, and they prefer you pay the minimum payment – a practice we will never, ever do during our life of savvy money and credit management.

3) If you’re offered a 0% APR promotional rate card, it’s okay to accept it but be 100% sure you understand all the terms.  Some cards simply want to acquire you as a long-term customer in the hopes you will buy stuff after the 0% intro period expires and end up owing interest.  This is fine, because you will learn the discipline and strategies to avoid that scenario.

There are other companies, however, that will try to small-print you past an annual fee of as much as $69… just to be an account holder.  Note this here and now:  NEVER PAY AN ANNUAL FEE ON A CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT.  If a company says it will charge you, tell them you’ll cancel the account and go elsewhere.  Simple as that.

4) Determine the length of the promo period on your new 0% card, decide a comfortable amount you’re willing to dedicate per month to pay off a purchase before that period expires, and pull the trigger.  Any time you can use OPM (Other People’s Money) to buy or invest without paying a fee or interest to do so, the only decision you need to make is whether you should make the purchase at all, because the method of payment has been intelligently determined.

For instance, let’s say the promo period is six months, there is no annual fee, and you are comfortable spending $50 per month for this purchase.  That means you can spend $250 – not $300, because we generally prefer to pay off the purchase a month or so before the expiration of the promo period.  This is simply a buffer to allow for unforeseen circumstances that might interfere with this payment.  Make the buy, pay $50 a month on it (always pay the monthly payment a few days before the minimum payment is due, and use online banking to establish the payment in advance so it becomes automatic), and have it paid by the end of Month 5 of the six-month promo period.

The idea behind this is two-fold.  First, you’re continuing to establish a better credit history.  Secondly, you’re learning the basics for OPM use that, down the road, can be done on a much larger scale with the purchase of asset-bolstering investments rather than a new gizmo or blouse and matching skirt.

5) Request credit limit increases on both of the first two cards you have obtained and used.  This can be done on-line at the card issuer’s website, or by phone to a toll-free customer service numbers.  You’re not interested in buying more stuff or more expensive stuff – that’s wrong-headed.  Instead, what you want is to maximize the available credit in your name but not utilize it.  That’s a key factor in establishing a great credit history that will allow you to qualify for the best-available financing on your first home, and/or maybe a car (although there are better ways to buy a car).

6) Seek out one or two more credit cards, focusing on those that offer cash-back rewards, but don’t get carried away.  Applying for credit means credit history inquiries, which are a temporary hit to your credit score, so they should be kept to a minimum.  That said, the small score deduction you will endure in the short run will be more than offset – fairly quickly – by having more available credit in your name, and the pay-off can add up fast if you’re able to acquire a card or two with meaningful cash-back rewards.

There are cards on the market currently offering quarterly cash-back of as much as 5% on certain types of purchases.  For instance, as I write this in August of 2017, the Chase Freedom card is offering 5% back at restaurants and movie theaters.  Others offer a flat rate of cash back on all purchases.

7) Use the cash-back card(s) smartly to maximize your benefit. This is very important, so please note:  Do NOT start buying things you don’t need, can’t afford, or wouldn’t buy were it not for the card and its associated perks.  If you typically go out to dinner once a week, for example, don’t start going six times a week.  But for that typical date-night dining, use the card with the 5% back on restaurants, and be sure to pay the entire balance off before the next minimum payment is due.

Look, we are no longer trying to establish credit.  You’ve achieved that already.  Now our focus is to take advantage of the available rewards without paying for the privilege in the form of interest.  DO NOT carry a balance!

Follow these steps, in order, and you will be a happy carrier of multiple cards, boaster of an impressive credit history, and will have paid a grand total of about $14 in the first four months for the accomplishments.  Pretty shrewd, dude!

Thanks for reading.

***

DISCLAIMER:  This post represents the author’s opinions only.  In no way should any part of the content of this post be interpreted as official financial advice, nor does it represent an intention to solicit readers into a specific company or investment.  Results are never guaranteed.  Utilize the information as you see fit, make all money decisions at your own risk.

Now that you know dividend-paying whole life insurance is the answer, here’s why…

By BOB CUNNINGHAM

Last week, I made the pronouncement that THE best thing you can do with your savings and investment dollars is to put them into a certain type of dividend-paying, whole life insurance.  I referred to the features and benefits of such policies, to illustrate why I have come to feel so strongly positive about these products.

But some additional perspective might be helpful, in the form of direct comparisons to the government-sponsored, conventional approaches promoted by so many self-proclaimed personal finance experts today.  (Remember, I am NOT an expert… but I am a licensed life insurance agent in California and, at the risk of coming across as full of myself, somewhat more knowledgeable in this area than most because I’ve studied this subject for most of the last decade, and I’m a graduate of SOHK – the School of Hard Knocks).

Okay, so why whole life insurance?  Here’s a breakdown:

Reason No. 1:  These policies offer clients virtually zero risk.  You’ll notice the word ‘virtually’ in there.  OK, technically, the insurance company that accepts your money and writes your policy could go out of business.  Any entity can.  But insurance companies rarely fail.  According to consumer research firm A.M. Best, less than 0.6 percent of life insurance companies have gone bankrupt outright since 1950.  Only a handful more had issues serious enough to require a take-over.  Some might point to conglomerate AIG and its need for a bailout about a decade ago.  But the equities investment arm of that company is what was on the brink of failure, not insurance.

And consider this:  If an insurance company does go down, the Guaranty Association will “insure the insured,” covering your cash values up to a certain figure and percentage.  Values and coverage vary depending on size, age of the policy, etc. but according to the California Department of Insurance, 80% of the cash value or death benefit (whichever applies) is paid typically.

Also, only a few of the more than 2,000 insurance companies nationally offer the specific types of dividend-paying whole life insurance that works best for this approach.  Stick to a company you’ve heard of and, well, your risk of losing your money is infinitely less than having it stuffed under your mattress at home.

Reason No. 2:  YOU control your own money at all times.  According to Douglas Andrew, the author of several pioneering personal finance books including his most famous, Missed Fortune, the most important characteristics shared by truly astute investments are:  safety, liquidity, and a rate of return.  He also adds tax-favored status as a factor that separates wise investments from the rest.

No. 1 above covered the aspects of safety, and the second point is the idea that you can access your money pretty much whenever you need it.  That is a seemingly basic but actually uncommon and invaluable control.  Conventional methods, such as saving in your company’s 401K Plan or in an Individual Retirement Account (IRA), immediately restrict you from your own funds unless you’re willing to pay penalties.  With both 401Ks and Traditional IRAs, you pay a 10% penalty plus the full income tax hit if you try to get at your money before age 59 1/2 and/or if the account has been open less than five years.  In a Roth IRA, you can pull out your contributions if you wish, but not the gains without the aforementioned extra costs.

And, with the 401K and Traditional IRA, you also have a problem on the back-end. Even if you prefer not to, the government has a minimum required distribution clause – fully taxed, of course – beginning at age 70 1/2.  If you don’t take it, Uncle Sam will make the withdrawal for you and penalize you on top of taking the taxes due.  That, my friends, is complete LACK of control… of YOUR money!

Reason No. 3:  Your money gets a guaranteed and steady rate of return, with no chance for loss.  The normal basic ROR is 4-5%, plus any dividends paid out.  Dividends aren’t guaranteed, but the companies that specialize in these special whole life policies have literally paid out dividends every year going back more than a century.  Refer back to previous posts about the importance of steady annual returns versus the volatile nature of traditional investments such as stocks and bonds.  Losing money hurts more than gains help. With these policies, you simply don’t lose money, regardless of what the markets do, domestically or internationally.

Still, I must ask… could you invest your money elsewhere and possibly earn a better return?  Of course, but consider that the government programs littered with Wall Street mutual funds and other similar products often carry with them high fees as well as no guarantee of any return at all (and thus, no downside protection).  Insurance companies have some associated fees as well, true, but those are already factored into the return and dividends – and made known to you up front – rather than subtracted from the end results. And they are typically lower than the fees charged inside a 401K Plan, notes Tony Robbins in his personal finance best-seller of a few years ago, Money: Master The Game.

Reason No. 4:  Tax-free access, bay-bee.  This advantage is often the most misunderstood, so let me clarify.  Any monies you’ve paid in as premiums into a whole life policy, as well as dividends earned, can be withdrawn from the policy free of income tax.  Any other funds accrued in the cash value can be accessed through policy loans.  Loan proceeds are never taxable.

And although there are those who think the government intends to eliminate that last feature from these products, such talk has purportedly been going on for decades and nothing’s come of it.  Plus, if the law did change it would almost certainly affect only future policies not yet written, not current ones already on the books.

Reason No. 5:  The policy can include a feature that allows your cash value nest egg to grow even if you borrow from it, as if you didn’t borrow at all.  That sounds too sweet to be factual, but it’s completely true and actually pretty straight-forward.  Written properly, these policies allow for this huge benefit because the loan proceeds come from the insurance company’s general fund, NOT the actual cash values of the clients.  The cash values are just the collateral, thereby allowing them to stay in place and grow as if no loan had been taken against them at all.

So imagine having $25,000 built up in the cash value of your policy and you want a new car.  You can borrow the funds from the insurance company (without qualifying – just request it, and the money will be made available to you in a few days), and the $25K will still be accruing the guaranteed ROR plus be part of how your potential dividend is determined.

You are charged interest on the loan, usually about 5%, but with the roughly matching rate of return, the loan is costing you a net of nothing.  And, you can choose the terms for paying it back.  You can even decide NOT to pay it back if you wish.  If the insured individual dies, and there are unpaid loans on the books, the loan balance is simply deducted from the death benefit before it is awarded to the policy’s beneficiary.  It should be noted that for most financial planning strategies involving whole life insurance, it is recommended that policy loans be repaid.

With all these valuable advantages – and truthfully, I’ve only touched on the most basic benefits – it’s hard to imagine anyone choosing instead to let the government control his or her funds.  But that choice remains out there and selected by a whole host of folks, most of which simply have no idea that the proper kind of life insurance has living benefits rather than just a death benefit and is far superior to traditional approaches to saving and investing.

Continue to consider all your choices, and be savvy… because you CAN Build Wealth Early!  Thanks for reading.

***

DISCLAIMER:  This post represents the author’s opinions only.  In no way should any part of the content of this post be interpreted as official financial advice, nor does it represent an intention to solicit readers into a specific company or investment.  Results are never guaranteed.  Utilize the information as you see fit, make all money decisions at your own risk.

Dividend-paying whole life insurance: The best financial strategy available today

By BOB CUNNINGHAM

Since establishing this personal finance blog last spring, I’ve alluded to a superior approach for allowing anyone to save money in a way that allows for maximum safety, a respectable rate of return that is free of income taxes, and the liquidity to access the funds that build up – plus have those funds continue to earn interest for you even while utilizing the money for purchases simultaneously.

But while I’ve touched on these different factors… given you varied teasers, if you will… I haven’t gone into much detail about the strategy of using properly-structured, dividend-paying whole life insurance as your primary savings vehicle.  And there’s a couple of different reasons for that.  1) I wanted to focus primarily on basic financial principles with this blog, because they aren’t taught with any degree of consistency but should be, with the idea that using the strategy I’m about to uncover is more of an advanced approach,  and 2) Even though I’m a licensed insurance agent in California, I’m still learning about the specifics of this technique and its plethora of “living benefits” to go along with the traditional death benefit.

In previous posts, we’ve covered the evils of government-sponsored investment/savings programs such as workplace 401Ks, Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs), and 529 Plans for college education expenses.  I explained how your lack of control over these instruments can subject your money to avoidable taxation, often ridiculously high fees, and an inconvenient (and needless) inaccessibility to your own funds.

We’ve also delved into the high-risk nature of investing in Wall Street via the equity markets; buying and selling real estate; commodities; collectibles; and just about anything else that will allegedly rise in value over time.

Despite the realities just mentioned in the preceding two paragraphs, the substantial majority of Americans continue to follow the herd and put virtually all of their hard-earned monies into these conventional accounts while holding their collective breaths wishing for steady appreciation and hoping not to get killed by taxes.

Why??????????????

Simply answered, because no one has ever bothered to show them a better alternative.  We hear, see, or read folks who purport to be personal finance “experts” (Suze Orman, Dave Ramsey, David Bach to name three) claiming the conventional, government-controlled approaches are the only way to go and assume what they’re pitching must make sense… because we simply don’t know any other way.  These personalities tend to black-ball permanent insurance (of which whole life is a type), criticizing what they don’t know enough about and, frankly, likely have never taken the time to truly investigate.

So, myself and many who have preceded me have decided we will be the voices (or written words) of reason, truth, and logic.

And on that note, and without further adieu, allow me to briefly detail the advantages of utilizing the proper type of dividend-paying whole life insurance:

Enjoy an immediate death benefit, while building a nest-egg you can access anytime you want.  When you open the right type of whole life insurance policy, your pre-determined death benefit is good from the first day in the event something happens to you (or whomever is the insured on the policy), and at the same time you begin building cash value that you can access whenever you want – no waiting until age 59 1/2 to avoid penalties like there is with the government -sponsored programs.

To be fair, the Roth IRA will allow you to withdraw your contributions at any time without having to pay taxes or a penalty, but that doesn’t apply to any gains the account may have made.  With the whole life policy, you can access virtually all of your account with the right approach (either via withdrawal or non-qualifying policy loan).  Refer to your individual agent for guidance on how to accomplish this.

Know, within a reasonable level of certainty, how much money you can build over a given period of time at essentially no risk.  Although dividends are not guaranteed, the companies that issue the type of policy I am referring to here have enjoyed profits (and, therefore, dividends paid to policy owners) for well more than 100 CONSECUTIVE years.  According to Pamela Yellen at www.BankonYourself.com, these companies have profited every single year since before 1900 – that includes during The Great Depression, times of war, The Crash of 1987, and the recession we endured about a decade ago.

Utilize the unique advantage of borrowing against your policy’s cash value, while it continues to grow as if you had never touched the funds.  That’s because you don’t.  Set up properly, these policies allow for the loan proceeds to come from the insurance company’s general fund, with your cash value as collateral, meaning that the cash value itself stays in place and continues to work for you, earning a rate of return plus dividends.

Loans are tax-free, and don’t have to be paid back on a schedule, or at all if you choose. The flexibility of this type of account is unheard of.  You want to borrow from your cash value?  Just let the insurance company know how much you need.  And although a sensible, long-term financial plan utilizing these policies as retirement vehicles compels you to repay these loans (pay yourself back at a lower-than-market interest rate), you are NOT required to do so.  Any unpaid loan balances still in effect at the time of the insured’s death simply results in that owed money being deducted from the impending death benefit.

In the coming weeks, we will cover more features – in more detail.  Bottom line, you should be excited about what I’m introducing to you here.  This immaculate alternative to conventional investing will greatly simplify your financial life, and benefit you multiple times over on multiple levels.

Until next time, thanks as always for reading.

***

DISCLAIMER:  This post represents the author’s opinions only.  In no way should any part of the content of this post be interpreted as official financial advice, nor does it represent an intention to solicit readers into a specific company or investment.  Results are never guaranteed.  Utilize the information as you see fit, make all money decisions at your own risk.